🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about that comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in press following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men winning major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's play in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use far too much effort to win it. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just express his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {