🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.